Philip Oakley <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'd expect 'git help --pdf git' to simply feed the path of git.pdf
> (probably in the same directory as the .html versions) to the web
> browser and let it determine the users prefered reader.
Yes, this is what I would do as well.  Unfortunately I don’t really
know C, so I can’t implement this.  But for someone who is familiar
with C, it should be easy---just call `xdg-open` (X11), `open` (OS X)
or `start` (Windows) and thus the user’s preferred PDF reader, and
maybe some common programs (evince, okular, …) as fallback.

Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> wrote:
> I didn't see (and I still do not quite see) why people would want to
> have separate pdf files for all the subcommands (instead of say an
> .epub or .pdf that binds all the man pages and perhaps user-manual,
> just like we do for .texi/.info).
Because it’s a good start :-)
I see your point, and I agree that a combined PDF/EPUB/etc would make
more sense.  This should be not too difficult with the
AsciiDoc-DocBook-Toolchain (or maybe even without DocBook), I just
need to dig into it a bit further.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to