On Wed, 27 May 2015 17:28:34 -0700
Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> wrote:
> so I just run into this problem again (which happens to me maybe
> twice a week): I want to do a git operations, so I type "git " into
> my shell,
[...]
> then I copy the whole operation "git revert --abort" in this case and
> paste it to the shell and let go.
> The result looks like
> $ git git revert --abort
> git: 'git' is not a git command. See 'git --help'.
[...]
> I wonder if we want to make a "git" subcommand, which behaves exactly
> the same as git itself?
> Then "git git git status" would just return the same as "git status".
In your ~/.whateverrc, put this:
git() {
while [ $# -gt 0 ]; do
test "$1" != "git" && break;
shift;
done;
command git $@;
}
This assumes a POSIX-compatible shell but I think you've got the idea.
("command" is a builtin which forces interpreting the following word as
the name of an external program.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
