On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 10:44:21AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Shouldn't you ensure o1 and o2 are commits here? > > Heh, I should have read the remainder of the thread before > responding. > > How about doing it this way? We know and trust that existing > revision traversal machinery is doing the right thing, and it is > only that the clear_commit_marks() calls are botched.
Yeah, I think this matches the recommendation I gave in the last round. I do still think we could get rid of this "second" traversal entirely in favor of using "--cherry", but that is a much larger topic. Even if somebody wants to pursue that, the immediate fix should look like this. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
