On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > 3 & 4 as a single patch may make more sense, if we were to tolerate the > "let's copy & paste first and then later remove the duplicate" as a way to > postpone touching "tag.c" side in order to first concentrate on for-each-ref. > > I have not formed a firm opinion on what the right split of the series is, but > so far (assuming that the temporary duplication is the best we can do) what > I am seeing in this series makes sense to me. > > Thanks.
That would mean squashing 3&4, 6&7 and 10&11 also on similar lines. -- Regards, Karthik Nayak -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
