On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Eric Sunshine <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> wrote: >> * Duy seems to think "worktree add" is coming, too, so here is a >> trivial tweak of your patch from the last month, with test >> adjustments to 7410 I sent earlier squashed in. > > Thanks. I was planning on re-rolling to use the new name ("add" rather > than "new") and to squash in the t7410 fix. Plus, I think the changes > I had to make to prepare_linked_checkout() in order to move it to > worktree.c should become separate preparatory patches so that the > actual relocation can become pure code movement (as much as possible). > > Also, I was planning on including Duy's patch in the re-roll since it > missed a s/prune --worktrees/worktree prune/ in > Documentation/git-checkout.txt.
Hmm, I see that Duy's patch is already in 'next'. Would it be better if I fixed the 's/prune --worktrees/worktree prune/' git-checkout.txt oversight via an incremental patch rather than including a corrected version of his patch with my re-roll? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
