Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes:
> Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes:
>
>> Dave Borowitz <dborow...@google.com> writes:
>>
>>> send-pack.c omits this field when args->url is null or empty. Fix the
>>> protocol specification to match reality.
>>
>> Do some clients omit this in the real world?
>>
>> As you say, send_pack() does omit it if args->url is null or empty,
>> but args is prepared in transport.c as a copy of transport->url when
>> the function is called, and that transport->url is how
>> builtin/push.c reports where it is pushing with:
>>
>> if (verbosity > 0)
>> fprintf(stderr, _("Pushing to %s\n"), transport->url);
>>
>> So I am somewhat puzzled...
>
> Answering myself, the most trivial example is "git send-pack" ;-)
> It passes args that has a NULL in the .url field.
... which may be something we want to fix, but that does not mean
the field is mandatory, as we have implementations in the field that
do not send it ;-)
The patch looks good.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
