On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Matthieu Moy <matthieu....@grenoble-inp.fr> wrote: > Karthik Nayak <karthik....@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Matthieu Moy >> <matthieu....@grenoble-inp.fr> wrote: >>> >>> I'm not sure what's the convention, but I think the test description >>> should give the expected behavior even with test_expect_failure. >>> >>> And please help the reviewers by saying what's the status wrt this test >>> (any plan on how to fix it?). >>> >> >> On the other hand I wonder if the test is even needed as, we don't >> really need it >> Cause we remove that ability of branch.c by using filter_refs(). > > Please read d0f810f (refs.c: allow listing and deleting badly named > refs, 2014-09-03). I think the reasoning makes sense, and we should keep > this ability. >
This makes sense, I didn't have a thorough look at this but it breaks a little in ref-filter.c while getting object attributes. So is it okay to mark this as TODO? -- Regards, Karthik Nayak -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
