Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 05:24:29PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Since 5a688fe4 ("core.sharedrepository = 0mode" should set, not
>> loosen, 2009-03-25), we kept reminding ourselves:
>>
>> NEEDSWORK: this should be renamed to finalize_temp_file() as
>> "moving" is only a part of what it does, when no patch between
>> master to pu changes the call sites of this function.
>>
>> without doing anything about it. Let's do so.
>>
>> The purpose of this function was not to move but to finalize. The
>> detail of the primarily implementation of finalizing was to link the
>> temporary file to its final name and then to unlink, which wasn't
>> even "moving". The alternative implementation did "move" by calling
>> rename(2), which is a fun tangent.
>
> This is definitely a better name. But while we are touching the area, my
> other pet peeve about this function is that it is really specific to
> moving _object_ temp files around. It started life as static-local to
> sha1-file.c, so not mentioning objects is OK, but when it became a
> global, it's a bit confusing.
>
> Maybe finalize_object_file() would be a better name?
>
> -Peff
OK, will fix.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
