On 08/13/2015 07:41 PM, David Turner wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 13:15 -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 5:57 PM, David Turner <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> diff --git a/t/t0060-path-utils.sh b/t/t0060-path-utils.sh
>>> index 93605f4..28e6dff 100755
>>> --- a/t/t0060-path-utils.sh
>>> +++ b/t/t0060-path-utils.sh
>>> +test_expect_success 'handle per-worktree refs in refs/worktree' '
>>> + git commit --allow-empty -m "initial commit" &&
>>> + git worktree add -b branch worktree &&
>>> + (
>>> + cd worktree &&
>>> + git commit --allow-empty -m "test commit" &&
>>> + git for-each-ref | test_must_fail grep refs/worktree &&
>>
>> s/test_must_fail/!/
>>
>> From t/README:
>>
>> On the other hand, don't use test_must_fail for running regular
>> platform commands; just use '! cmd'. We are not in the business
>> of verifying that the world given to us sanely works.
>
> When I make that change, my test fails with:
>
> FATAL: Unexpected exit with code 2
>
> Apparently, you can't use ! in pipelines like that. So that's why I
> used test_must_fail.
You would have to negate the whole pipeline, like
! git for-each-ref | grep refs/worktree
The result of a pipeline is taken from the last command.
Michael
--
Michael Haggerty
[email protected]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
