Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes:

> Not sure I follow there.
>
> Original implementation:
> We have M threads sitting around the table, all of them trying to obtain food
> from the one bowl on the table and then eating it.
> Once the bowl is all eaten, we can stop.
>
> New pattern:
> One cook puts all the food items on the sushi-go-round-belt with a fancy plate
> and the threads grab them one by one still using locks (but they are internal 
> to
> the belt).
>
> Are you saying we're content with just a bowl and everyone helps themselves
> for getting food?

No.  I am questioning how big overhead is for having the
go-round-belt that must hold all dishes to be eaten, which did not
exist in the original arrangement.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to