2015-08-29 4:21 GMT-06:00 Philip Oakley <philipoak...@iee.org>:
> Should the '<' stdin redirection be shown?
>
> It looks (at first glance) as if this gained a double '< <' at the beginning
> of 'ref-list', rather than being a clean indication of the redirection.
> Perhaps change 'ref-list' to 'ref-list-file' for a slight improvement in
> clarity - this it's only occurance, and the redirection would best match a
> file.

This syntax occurs in three other places in Git:

git cat-file (--batch | --batch-check) [--follow-symlinks] < <list-of-objects>

git check-attr --stdin [-z] [-a | --all | <attr>...] < <list-of-paths>

git hash-object  --stdin-paths < <list-of-paths>

So if we need to say <ref-list-file> for clarity, we should also say
<object-list-file> and <path-list-file> for these other commands.

I think the most sane thing to do is to commit this patch as-is, and
then someone can submit a separate patch to reword all four usage
strings for increased clarity.

-Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to