On Aug 31, 2015, at 05:10 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote: >I'm probably shot down for this. But could we go with a clean plate >and create a new command prefix (something like git-next, git2, or >gt...)? We could then redesign the entire UI without worrying about >backward compatibility. At some point we can start to deprecate "git" >and encourage to use the new command prefix only. Of course somebody >has to go over all the commands and options to propose some consistent >UI, then more discussions and coding so it could likely follow the >path of pack v4..
`git` itself could also be a thin wrapper which consulted a configuration variable to see which version of the ui to expose. "All problems in computer science can be solved by another level of indirection" Cheers, -Barry
pgpFxZ3we9pOm.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
