Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes: > One of the mistakes I made last week was mixing these quite stable patches > with highly RFC/WIP patches and not pointing out loud which is which.
I think it was very clear which is which to people who have been following (which are the only people you would care about anyway), but I agree that it would be easier to follow by others if you made two series, i.e. solid bits like this one, marked with "PATCH v$n", and the WIP part as a separate series, described as building on the v$n reroll of the other series in its own cover letter. Thanks, will replace. Let's move this part to 'next' and start cooking. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
