On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Eric Sunshine <sunsh...@sunshineco.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Matthieu Moy
> <matthieu....@grenoble-inp.fr> wrote:
>> Karthik Nayak <karthik....@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> @@ -679,15 +682,20 @@ static int print_ref_list(int kinds, int detached,
>>> int verbose, int abbrev, stru
>>> if (verbose)
>>> maxwidth = calc_maxwidth(&ref_list, strlen(remote_prefix));
>>>
>>> - qsort(ref_list.list, ref_list.index, sizeof(struct ref_item),
>>> ref_cmp);
>>> + index = ref_list.index;
>>> +
>>> + /* Print detached HEAD before sorting and printing the rest */
>>> + if (detached && (ref_list.list[index - 1].kind == REF_DETACHED_HEAD)
>>> &&
>>> + !strcmp(ref_list.list[index - 1].name, head)) {
>>> + print_ref_item(&ref_list.list[index - 1], maxwidth, verbose,
>>> abbrev,
>>> + 1, remote_prefix);
>>> + index -= 1;
>>> + }
>>
>> I think Eric already mentionned it, but I don't remember the conclusion
>> and can't find it in the archives. Wouldn't it be cleaner to actually
>> remove the detached head from the array (do "ref_list.index -= 1"
>> instead of "index -= 1", and possibly free() what needs to be freed?
>
> I think Michael Haggerty mentioned something along those lines...
Specifically, I think you're referring to [1] (?).
[1]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/276363/focus=276676
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
