On 15-09-17 10:37 AM, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> strtoul_ui uses strtoul to get a long unsigned, then checks that casting
> to unsigned does not lose information and return the casted value.
> 
> On 64 bits architecture, checking that the cast does not change the value
> catches most errors, but when sizeof(int) == sizeof(long) (e.g. i386),
> the check does nothing. Unfortunately, strtoul silently accepts negative
> values, and as a result strtoul_ui("-1", ...) raised no error.
> 
> This patch catches negative values before it's too late, i.e. before
> calling strtoul. We still silently accept very large integers that wrap
> to a valid "unsigned int".
> 
> Reported-by: Max Kirillov <m...@max630.net>
> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <matthieu....@imag.fr>
> ---
> So, here's a proper patch (I mean, a band-aid patch, but properly
> send ;-) ).
> 
> It should be merged before Kartik's series (or inserted at the start
> of the series) so that we get the fix before the test breakage.
> 
>  git-compat-util.h | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/git-compat-util.h b/git-compat-util.h
> index f649e81..1df82fa 100644
> --- a/git-compat-util.h
> +++ b/git-compat-util.h
> @@ -814,6 +814,9 @@ static inline int strtoul_ui(char const *s, int base, 
> unsigned int *result)
>       char *p;
>  
>       errno = 0;
> +     /* negative values would be accepted by strtoul */
> +     if (strchr(s, '-'))
> +             return -1;

I think this is broken, in that it doesn't match strtoul's normal behaviour,
for strings like "1234-5678", no?

The test also doesn't work if the string has leading whitespace ("  -5").

>       ul = strtoul(s, &p, base);
>       if (errno || *p || p == s || (unsigned int) ul != ul)
>               return -1;

Hmm, but we check *p here, so IIUC it's an error if the string has any
trailing non-digits.  Weird.

                M.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to