On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote: > > So I think we would probably want to treat EAGAIN specially: return -1 > to signal to the caller but _don't_ truncate the strbuf.
Yeah, "don't truncate" is needed. > Arguably we should actually return the number of bytes we _did_ read, > but then caller cannot easily tell the difference between EOF and > EAGAIN. Why can't it check errno==EAGAIN/EWOULDBLOCK? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
