Stefan Beller <[email protected]> writes:
> We will need computing the return value in a later patch without the
> wait.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <[email protected]>
> ---
> run-command.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/run-command.c b/run-command.c
> index 28e1d55..674e348 100644
> --- a/run-command.c
> +++ b/run-command.c
> @@ -232,6 +232,35 @@ static inline void set_cloexec(int fd)
> fcntl(fd, F_SETFD, flags | FD_CLOEXEC);
> }
>
> +static int determine_return_value(int wait_status,
> + int *result,
> + int *error_code,
> + const char *argv0)
> +{
> + if (WIFSIGNALED(wait_status)) {
> + *result = WTERMSIG(wait_status);
> + if (*result != SIGINT && *result != SIGQUIT)
> + error("%s died of signal %d", argv0, *result);
> + /*
> + * This return value is chosen so that code & 0xff
> + * mimics the exit code that a POSIX shell would report for
> + * a program that died from this signal.
> + */
Not a new problem but "from these signals", I think.
> @@ -244,29 +273,10 @@ static int wait_or_whine(pid_t pid, const char *argv0)
> if (waiting < 0) {
> failed_errno = errno;
> error("waitpid for %s failed: %s", argv0, strerror(errno));
> -...
> } else {
> - error("waitpid is confused (%s)", argv0);
> + if (waiting != pid
> + || (determine_return_value(status, &code, &failed_errno,
> argv0) < 0))
Move "||" to the end of the previous line?
> + error("waitpid is confused (%s)", argv0);
> }
>
> clear_child_for_cleanup(pid);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
