On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 13:40 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > How about phrasing it totally differently? > > The ref specifies the full refname when it begins with > `refs/notes/`; otherwise `ref/notes/` is prefixed to form a > full name of the ref. > > I think that would remove the need to illustrate with concrete > examples like refs/heads/blah. >
Wait, what about the DWIM of notes/<name> goes to refs/notes/<name>.. do we need to explain that here? it might seem that "notes/foo" ends up as "refs/notes/notes/foo" which is not really what we mean. Regards, JakeN�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����ا���ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z��w���?�����&�)ߢf