I just noticed something interesting.
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Edmundo Carmona Antoranz
<eantor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
>> I do find what Peff showed us a lot easier to follow.
>>
>> if (opts.show_progress < 0) {
>> if (opts.quiet)
>> opts.show_progress = 0;
>> else
>> opts.show_progress = isatty(2);
>> }
>>
>
> Ok.... let me rewrite it that way. Other than that, the other things are ok?
In Peff's implementation I think he uses -1 as --no-progress, 1 as
--progress and 0 as undefined, right?
In my implementation I'm using -1 as undefined and 0 as --no-progress.
What would be the standard approach? From what I can see on
parse_options's behavior, if you select --no-progress, the variable
ends up with a 0, which makes me think I'm using the right approach.
End result with my assumptions would be:
if (opts.show_progress) {
/* user selected --progress or didn't specify */
if (opts.quiet) {
opts.show_progress = 0;
} else if (opts.show_progress < 0) {
opts.show_progress = isatty(2);
}
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
