Knut Franke <[email protected]> writes: > On 2015-11-02 14:46, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> > Reviewed-by: Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> >> > Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <[email protected]> >> >> Please add these only when you are doing the final submission, >> sending the same version reviewed by these people after they said >> the patch(es) look good. To credit others for helping you to polish >> your patch, Helped-by: would be more appropriate. > > Sorry about that. > > However, may I suggest that Documentation/SubmittingPatches could do with a > little rewording in this respect? > >> Do not forget to add trailers such as "Acked-by:", "Reviewed-by:" and >> "Tested-by:" lines as necessary to credit people who helped your >> patch. > > "Helped-by:" isn't even mentioned.
That is because it is not actively encouraged. The only thing I care about is that people do not incorrectly use Reviewed/Acked-by when reviewers did not say "this version looks good"; that would mislead the maintainer to think "ah, if that reviewer said this is good, whose judgment I can trust, then I do not have to read it carefully myself." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
