Doug Kelly <dougk....@gmail.com> writes: > I think the patches I sent (a bit prematurely) address the > remaining comments... I did find there was a relevant test in > t5304 already, so I added a new test in the same section (and > cleaned up some of the garbage it wasn't removing before). I'm > not sure if it's poor form to move tests around like this, but I > figured it might be best to keep them logically grouped.
OK, will queue as I didn't spot anything glaringly wrong ;-) I did wonder if we want to say anything about .bitmap files, though. If there is one without matching .idx and .pack, shouldn't we report just like we report .idx without .pack (or vice versa)? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
