On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 19:01:18 +0000, Jeff King wrote:
....
> > Can't we handle this in resolve_gitlink_ref itself? As I understand it,
> > it should resolve a ref (here "HEAD") when path points to a submodule.
> > When there isn't one it should return -1, so:
>
> I'm not sure. I think part of the change to git-clean was that
> is_git_directory() is a _better_ check than "can we resolve HEAD?"
> because it covers empty repos, too.
I could do
refs = find_ref_cache(submodule);
if (!refs && !is_git_directory(....
in resolve_gitlink_ref().
...
> > @@ -1553,6 +1553,10 @@ int resolve_gitlink_ref(const char *path, const char
> > *refname, unsigned char *sh
> > if (!len)
> > return -1;
> > submodule = xstrndup(path, len);
> > + if (!is_git_directory(submodule)) {
> > + free(submodule);
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > refs = get_ref_cache(submodule);
> > free(submodule);
>
> I don't think it produces wrong outcomes, but I think it's sub-optimal.
> In cases where we already have a ref cache, we'll hit the filesystem for
> each lookup to re-confirm what we already know. That doesn't affect your
> case, but it does when we actually _do_ have a submodule.
I could do
refs = find_ref_cache(submodule);
if (!refs && !is_git_directory(....
Also, in my case the current code tries .git/HEAD and .git/packed-refs
for each directory.
> So if we were to follow this route, I think it would go better in
> get_ref_cache itself (right after we determine there is no existing
> cache, but before we call create_ref_cache()).
The stupid part is that get_ref_cache itself only creates the
cache entry and leaved the actual check for later - then it
is too late to not create the cache entry.
Also, when we put it into get_ref_cache we need to return null
for our case and see what for_each_ref_submodule & co make out of that.
That's why I'd like it in resolve_gitlink_ref. :-) Or we put an
no_create parameter into get_ref_cache(). Probably violating
some style guide:
diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
index 132eff5..005d0eb 100644
--- a/refs.c
+++ b/refs.c
@@ -1160,7 +1160,7 @@ static struct ref_cache *create_ref_cache(const char
*submodule)
* will be allocated and initialized but not necessarily populated; it
* should not be freed.
*/
-static struct ref_cache *get_ref_cache(const char *submodule)
+static struct ref_cache *get_ref_cache(const char *submodule, int do_create)
{
struct ref_cache *refs;
@@ -1171,6 +1171,9 @@ static struct ref_cache *get_ref_cache(const char
*submodule)
if (!strcmp(submodule, refs->name))
return refs;
+ if (!do_create && !is_git_directory(submodule))
+ return 0;
+
refs = create_ref_cache(submodule);
refs->next = submodule_ref_caches;
submodule_ref_caches = refs;
@@ -1553,9 +1556,12 @@ int resolve_gitlink_ref(const char *path, const char
*refname, unsigned char *sh
if (!len)
return -1;
submodule = xstrndup(path, len);
- refs = get_ref_cache(submodule);
+ refs = get_ref_cache(submodule, 0);
free(submodule);
+ if (!refs)
+ return -1;
+
retval = resolve_gitlink_ref_recursive(refs, refname, sha1, 0);
return retval;
}
@@ -2126,7 +2132,7 @@ int for_each_ref(each_ref_fn fn, void *cb_data)
int for_each_ref_submodule(const char *submodule, each_ref_fn fn, void
*cb_data)
{
- return do_for_each_ref(get_ref_cache(submodule), "", fn, 0, 0, cb_data);
+ return do_for_each_ref(get_ref_cache(submodule, 1), "", fn, 0, 0,
cb_data);
}
int for_each_ref_in(const char *prefix, each_ref_fn fn, void *cb_data)
@@ -2146,7 +2152,7 @@ int for_each_fullref_in(const char *prefix, each_ref_fn
fn, void *cb_data, unsig
int for_each_ref_in_submodule(const char *submodule, const char *prefix,
each_ref_fn fn, void *cb_data)
{
- return do_for_each_ref(get_ref_cache(submodule), prefix, fn,
strlen(prefix), 0, cb_data);
+ return do_for_each_ref(get_ref_cache(submodule, 1), prefix, fn,
strlen(prefix), 0, cb_data);
}
int for_each_tag_ref(each_ref_fn fn, void *cb_data)
(might be nicer to split into find_ref_cache() and get_ref_cache()
instead of adding the parameter).
...
> 2. But for a little more work, pushing the is_git_directory() check
> out to the call-sites gives us probably saner semantics overall.
Actually, I don't quite think that. The code we push out would be
the same in each place ('is_git_directory() && ...'), wouldn't it?
Andreas
--
"Totally trivial. Famous last words."
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
