On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:11:16AM -0800, Victor Leschuk wrote: > >> The earlier version of this patch is already included in /pu branch, >> however as we all agreed ($gmane/280299) we have changed the default >> behavior and the meaning of "0". The question is: what is the right >> way to include changes from patch v6 (this one) into already merged >> patch to pu? > > Merging to "pu" does not really mean anything; it is simply that the > maintainer has picked it up as a possible topic of interest. Patches can > (and often are) still re-written in that state. > > Junio is on vacation for a few weeks, and I'm acting as maintainer in > the interim. I've added your v6 to my pile of patches to look at, but I > haven't gone over it carefully yet.
To be perfectly explicit: Patches in 'pu' get replaced wholesale by newer versions, so you would simply send the new version of the patch in its entirety (as you did with v6). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
