On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 18:56 -0500, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.c
> om> wrote:
> > Also, shouldn't --list-aliases (or --dump-aliases) be mutually
> > exclusive with many of the other options? New tests would check
> > such
> > exclusivity as well.
>
> In fact, while I agree with Szeder that it makes sense to re-use
> send-email's aliases parsing functionality (and was going to suggest
> the same, but he beat me to it), this new option is awfully
> orthogonal
> to the overall purpose of send-email, thus, doesn't really fit in
> well
> and almost cries out for a command of its own which would be used by
> send-email and bash completion (though I'm not convinced that it's
> worth going that route for this one minor use-case).
I don't think it's worth it at this point, because we'd have to extract
out the alias parsing logic from send-email, which is not easy.
The option is pretty orthogonal to git-send-email, but until/unless
git-send-email is re-implemented in C, i don't really see value in
trying to separate the logic out... That is a lot more effort for very
little gain.
Regards,
JakeN�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����ا���ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z� �w���?�����&�)ߢf
