On 18/11, Lars Schneider wrote:
git diff branchA...branchB
--> gives me the diff between (the common ancestor of A and B) and B. That 
means I never see changes on branchA.

git log branchA...branchB
--> gives me the commits reachable from A and B. That includes changes from 
branchA.

Is this because of a design decision that I do not (yet) understand or is this 
inconsistent for historical reasons?


The standard meaning of A...B is all the commits reachable from A or B, but not from both. (See gitrevisions(7) for more info.)

git-diff has its own nonstandard definition, where A...B is defined as all the commits from a comman ancestor of A and B, up to B.

--
Sincerely,
 Johannes Löthberg
 PGP Key ID: 0x50FB9B273A9D0BB5
 https://theos.kyriasis.com/~kyrias/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to