UPDATE:

The initial message (see below) got rejected because it wasn't
text/plain, so meanwhile a few things happened.

I was reading the manual pages of gitattributes and saw the note

> When text=auto normalization is enabled in an existing repository, any text 
> files containing CRLFs should be normalized......

indeed, running

> rm ...index && git reset && git add -u && git commit -m "normalize crlf"

fixed the initial problem, leaving me with a new QUESTION:

why "git rm -rf --cached . && git reset --hard HEAD" is NOT showing
dirty files that need normalization, but "rm ....index && git reset"
does?










INITIAL MESSAGE:

Hello

I am running "git cherry-pick <HASH>" from one maintenance branch B2
to another B1, where B2 is newer than B1, in a repository with
.gitattributes containing

> * text=auto



You can see an excerpt of the output below.
Files 2-3-4 were deleted/renamed in B2 (newer branch). It seems that
git cherry-pick is trying to normalize the files, but it fails because
the files don't exist in the newer branch.



> warning: CRLF will be replaced by LF in file1.html.
> The file will have its original line endings in your working directory.
> error: addinfo_cache failed for path 'file2.txt'
> error: addinfo_cache failed for path 'file3.xml'
> error: addinfo_cache failed for path 'file4.js'
> U file4.js
> error: commit is not possible because you have unmerged files.
> hint: Fix them up in the work tree, and then use 'git add/rm <file>'
> hint: as appropriate to mark resolution and make a commit.
> fatal: Exiting because of an unresolved conflict.




I have tried

> git cherry-pick --strategy=recursive -X=no-renormalize <HASH>


to no avail.
At the moment, the only fix I can have is to remove "* text=auto" from
.gitattributes

I mention that before the cherry-pick, the git status is clean.

I am not subscribed to the mailing list, so please keep me in CC

Thank you in advance,
Andrei

-- 
andreineculau.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to