On 23 Nov 2015, at 19:59, Marc Strapetz <marc.strap...@syntevo.com> wrote:

> On 23.11.2015 18:04, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
>> Hello Mark,
>> 
>> On 23 Nov 2015, at 12:04, Marc Strapetz <marc.strap...@syntevo.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> There is a strange "branch --set-upstream-to" failure for "clones" which 
>>> haven't been created using "git clone" but constructed using "git init", 
>>> "git remote add" and "git fetch".
>>> 
>>> Following script first creates a "main" repository and then constructs the 
>>> clone. Finally, in the clone branches origin/1 and origin/2 will be 
>>> present, however it's not possible to invoke "git branch --set-upstream-to" 
>>> for origin/2 (it works fine for origin/1).
>>> 
>>> I guess the behavior is related to following line in .git/config:
>>> 
>>> fetch = refs/heads/1:refs/remotes/origin/1
>>> 
>>> However, I don't understand what's the problem for Git here? Definitely the 
>>> error "starting point 'origin/2' is not a branch" is wrong.
>>> 
>> 
>> That is indeed the issue. The configuration which is stored in the 
>> configuration is a remote+branch pair. If there is no fetch refspec 
>> configured which would create the ‘origin/2’ remote-tracking branch, the 
>> command does not know which remote and branch that would correspond to.
> 
> Thanks, Carlos, I understand now.
> 
> My goal is to have a clone which will only fetch specific branches, so I 
> guess I have to stick with "refs/heads/1:refs/remotes/origin/1" for the 
> beginning and for every new branch X add another 
> "refs/heads/X:refs/remotes/origin/X"? Or is there a better way?

If you want fine-grained control over what gets downloaded, you’ll need to 
restrict either the configured refspecs or the ones which git-fetch gets.

You can configure the individual refspecs so a ‘git fetch’ call will download 
the ones you want, giving you the issue you mention here; or you can configure 
the default refspec, but always pass explicit instructions to git-fetch, like 
‘git fetch refs/heads/1 refs/heads/2’. Newer git versions (past 1.9.3 I think) 
will update the remote-tracking bracnhes when you do it this way.

Both of these are annoying in their own way. The second way might be preferable 
if the fetching is done by a script. But if you absent-mindedly run a lone ‘git 
fetch’, then you’ll download all branches.

Cheers,
   cmn

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to