On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> writes: > >> I was wrong, GIT_WORK_TREE support was added in git-clone many years >> ago in 20ccef4 (make git-clone GIT_WORK_TREE aware - 2007-07-06). So >> my change accidentally triggers an (undocumented) feature. We could >> add a hack to ignore GIT_WORK_TREE if GIT_DIR is set too, but I don't >> think people will like it. I don't really like reverting d95138e >> (setup: set env $GIT_WORK_TREE when work tree is set, like $GIT_DIR - >> 2015-06-26) because another bug reappears. > >> So I'm out of options.. > > Perhaps d95138e can be reverted and then the bug it tried to fix can > be fixed in a different way somehow? > > (I am not quite up to speed yet, so the above may turn out to be > infeasible--take it with a large grain of salt please).
That would mean we do not set $GIT_DIR too early. While it sounds good, it could be just another trap, and could be a lot of reorganizing setup code. I'm more tempted to revert 20ccef4, with deprecation warning for some releases, and a new git-clone option for the same functionality. But let me sleep on it (and everybody please give ideas if you have any). Meanwhile, maybe reverting d95138e should be done any way for now. Broken aliases are not as bad as broken hooks. -- Duy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
