On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: >> >> Tested-by: Per Cederqvist <ced...@opera.com> > > Isn't this Reported-by? (genuine question; I haven't caught up with > my inbox backlog and do not claim having seen everything Per wrote > to this list).
Per wrote he tested `git submodule sync --recursive` with 2.6.3, so yeah the tested refers to the underlying command, not this patch. So Reported-by is better here. > >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> >> --- >> >> This applies on origin/master. > > Thanks. Should it go to maintenance track (iow, was the feature > that wasn't documented already in maint)? It was introduced via (82f49f294c, Teach --recursive to submodule sync, 2012-10-26) so I guess maint is fine, too >> @@ -237,6 +237,9 @@ sync:: >> + >> "git submodule sync" synchronizes all submodules while >> "git submodule sync \-- A" synchronizes submodule "A" only. >> ++ >> +If `--recursive` is specified, this command will recurse into the >> +registered submodules, and update any nested submodules within. I should have paid more attention here and s/update/sync/. I'll prepare a resend. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
