On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 05:20:41PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:

> Of course that is a bitter pill to swallow if you have reasons for
> wanting to use the old sha1s. E.g., you have internal development
> proceeding against the old tree and want to share a truncated version
> with the public.

After re-reading your email, it looks like your use case is just to be
able to later prove the existence of the original history. You could
that by mentioning the original "C" in your truncated "D", but in a way
that git does not traverse reachability. For instance, amend D's commit
message to say:

  This is based on earlier, unpublished work going up to commit C.

Then retain C for yourself, and show it only to those you want to prove
its contents to.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to