On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> * sb/submodule-parallel-update (2015-11-20) 27 commits
...
>
>  Waiting for sb/submodule-parallel-fetch to stabilize.
>
>  It would be the cleanest to rebuild sb/submodule-parallel-fetch on
>  top of 2.7.0 once it ships and then build this directly on top;
>  that way, we do not have to have merges in this topic that
>  distracting (besides, some part of the other topic can be updated
>  in-place instead of this follow-up topic tweaking them as past
>  mistakes and inflexibilities).
>
>  I picked up v4 from the list, but it needs review.




>
> * sb/submodule-parallel-fetch (2015-11-24) 17 commits
>   (merged to 'next' on 2015-12-04 at 2c5ea47)
>  + run-command: detect finished children by closed pipe rather than waitpid
>   (merged to 'next' on 2015-11-20 at 89fc723)
>  + strbuf: update documentation for strbuf_read_once()
>  + run-command: remove set_nonblocking()
>   (merged to 'next' on 2015-10-23 at 8f04bbd)
>  + run-command: fix missing output from late callbacks
>  + test-run-command: increase test coverage
>  + test-run-command: test for gracefully aborting
>  + run-command: initialize the shutdown flag
>  + run-command: clear leftover state from child_process structure
>  + run-command: fix early shutdown
>   (merged to 'next' on 2015-10-15 at df63590)
>  + submodules: allow parallel fetching, add tests and documentation
>  + fetch_populated_submodules: use new parallel job processing
>  + run-command: add an asynchronous parallel child processor
>  + sigchain: add command to pop all common signals
>  + strbuf: add strbuf_read_once to read without blocking
>  + xread_nonblock: add functionality to read from fds without blocking
>  + xread: poll on non blocking fds
>  + submodule.c: write "Fetching submodule <foo>" to stderr
>  (this branch is tangled with sb/submodule-parallel-update.)
>
>  Add a framework to spawn a group of processes in parallel, and use
>  it to run "git fetch --recurse-submodules" in parallel.
>
>  Waiting for review.

What kind of review do you wait for?
Each patch had lots of discussion, both submodule people (Jens)
and Windows people (various) seem to be happy with this.

I assume you plan on merging this after 2.7 settled and then we can
also get the above sb/submodule-parallel-update going again.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to