The man page of read(2) says:

  EAGAIN The file descriptor fd refers to a file other than a socket
         and has been marked nonblocking (O_NONBLOCK), and the read
         would block.

  EAGAIN or EWOULDBLOCK
         The file descriptor fd refers to a socket and has been marked
         nonblocking (O_NONBLOCK), and the read would block.  POSIX.1-2001
         allows either error to be returned for this case, and does not
         require these constants to have the same value, so a portable
         application should check for both possibilities.

If we get an EAGAIN or EWOULDBLOCK the fd must have set O_NONBLOCK.
As the intent of xread is to read as much as possible either until the
fd is EOF or an actual error occurs, we can ease the feeder of the fd
by not spinning the whole time, but rather wait for it politely by not
busy waiting.

We should not care if the call to poll failed, as we're in an infinite
loop and can only get out with the correct read().

Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Sixt <j...@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com>
---
 wrapper.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/wrapper.c b/wrapper.c
index 6fcaa4d..1770efa 100644
--- a/wrapper.c
+++ b/wrapper.c
@@ -236,8 +236,24 @@ ssize_t xread(int fd, void *buf, size_t len)
            len = MAX_IO_SIZE;
        while (1) {
                nr = read(fd, buf, len);
-               if ((nr < 0) && (errno == EAGAIN || errno == EINTR))
-                       continue;
+               if (nr < 0) {
+                       if (errno == EINTR)
+                               continue;
+                       if (errno == EAGAIN || errno == EWOULDBLOCK) {
+                               struct pollfd pfd;
+                               pfd.events = POLLIN;
+                               pfd.fd = fd;
+                               /*
+                                * it is OK if this poll() failed; we
+                                * want to leave this infinite loop
+                                * only when read() returns with
+                                * success, or an expected failure,
+                                * which would be checked by the next
+                                * call to read(2).
+                                */
+                               poll(&pfd, 1, -1);
+                       }
+               }
                return nr;
        }
 }
-- 
2.6.4.443.ge094245.dirty

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to