The Git CodingGuidelines prefer the $(...) construct for command
substitution instead of using the backquotes `...`.
The backquoted form is the traditional method for command
substitution, and is supported by POSIX. However, all but the
simplest uses become complicated quickly. In particular, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
perl -i -pe 'BEGIN{undef $/;} s/`(.+?)`/\$(\1)/smg' "${_f}"
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <[email protected]>
---
t/t5510-fetch.sh | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t5510-fetch.sh b/t/t5510-fetch.sh
index 0ba9db0..47e68a5 100755
--- a/t/t5510-fetch.sh
+++ b/t/t5510-fetch.sh
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ test_description='Per branch config variables affects "git
fetch".
. ./test-lib.sh
-D=`pwd`
+D=$(pwd)
test_bundle_object_count () {
git verify-pack -v "$1" >verify.out &&
@@ -64,8 +64,8 @@ test_expect_success "fetch test" '
cd two &&
git fetch &&
test -f .git/refs/heads/one &&
- mine=`git rev-parse refs/heads/one` &&
- his=`cd ../one && git rev-parse refs/heads/master` &&
+ mine=$(git rev-parse refs/heads/one) &&
+ his=$(cd ../one && git rev-parse refs/heads/master) &&
test "z$mine" = "z$his"
'
@@ -75,8 +75,8 @@ test_expect_success "fetch test for-merge" '
git fetch &&
test -f .git/refs/heads/two &&
test -f .git/refs/heads/one &&
- master_in_two=`cd ../two && git rev-parse master` &&
- one_in_two=`cd ../two && git rev-parse one` &&
+ master_in_two=$(cd ../two && git rev-parse master) &&
+ one_in_two=$(cd ../two && git rev-parse one) &&
{
echo "$one_in_two "
echo "$master_in_two not-for-merge"
--
2.3.3.GIT
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
