Jonathan Smith <jonathan.sm...@fphcare.co.nz> writes: > It's pretty clear that code stored in a Git repository isn't > considered a derived work of Git, regardless of whether it is used > in a commercial context or otherwise. > > However, I'm unable to find this stated in any authoritative and > unambiguous manner.
Is it reasonable to ask for such a statement? I doubt it, especially if "It's pretty clear". Without such a statement, I think we have already seen that the commercial adoption is already appealing. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
