On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:54:29PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi Peff,
>
> On Sun, 31 Jan 2016, Jeff King wrote:
>
> > > It's a shame that we can't just factor out this common
> > > code, but I don't think it's quite long enough to merit
> > > the boilerplate. The interesting part of each function
> > > happens inside the loop. If C had lambdas, we could do
> > > something like:
> > >
> > > foreach_path_from(stdin, nul_term_line) {
> > > /* now do something interesting with "buf"
> > > and some other local variables */
> > > }
>
> Technically, we do not have to do lambdas for that paradigm, we could
> introduce a new data type and a reader, i.e. something like this:
> [...]
> And then the repeated code could be replaced by something like this:
>
> struct path_reader path_reader = PATH_READER_INIT;
>
> while (read_next_path(&reader, stdin, 1)) {
> ... [work with reader->path.buf] ...
> }
>
> cleanup_path_reader();
Yeah, you're right. I was thinking of lifting the loop completely out of
the call-sites, but simplifying it to a single line loop condition is
just as good.
I still think this crosses my line of "too much boilerplate to be worth
it", though.
-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
