On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Elia Pinto <gitter.spi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> + mv `ls .git/objects/pack/*.pack` pack && > > No, please. From the git coding guideline : "We prefer $( ... ) for > command substitution; unlike ``, it properly nests.
I was being too subtle with the word "ugly". I assure you this test cannot be merged in its current form. But that's not important. It makes me think, can we catch `..` automatically? I know the test suite can catch broken && command sequence. Maybe we can do the same for`..`? > It should have been the way Bourne spelled it from day one, but > unfortunately isn't." > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4708549/whats-the-difference-between-command-and-command-in-shell-programming -- Duy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
