tbo...@web.de writes: > From: Torsten Bögershausen <tbo...@web.de> > > When core.autocrlf is set to false, and no attributes are set, the file > is treated as binary.
This, and also on the title, I know by "binary" you mean "no conversion is attempted", and it is the word used in the code around there, but it still makes my heart skip a beat every time I read this sentence--it is not like we do not treat the contents as text after all. In any case, I take the above sentence the statement of the fact, describing how the world currently is, not declaring a new world order. > Simplify the logic and remove duplicated code when dealing with > (crlf_action == CRLF_GUESS && auto_crlf == AUTO_CRLF_FALSE) by > setting crlf_action=CRLF_BINARY already in convert_attrs(). I looked at all the places where CRLF_BINARY is checked. The ones that are in this patch are clearly where "Is it BINARY?" and "Is AUTO_CRLF_FALSE and CRLF_GUESS both true?" mean the same thing, so this is a correct simplification to these places. It is not easy to see what the effect of this change to the other places that use CRLF_BINARY, though. * output_eol() used to return EOL_UNSET when auto_crlf is not in effect and CRLF_GUESS is. The function will see CRLF_BINARY with this patch in such a case, and returns EOL_UNSET. So there is no change to the function and its callers. * convert_attrs() has "If BINARY don't do anything and return". Will the patch change behaviour for the "not-autocrlf, CRLF_GUESS" case in this codepath? I think ca->crlf_action used to be left as CRLF_GUESS here before the patch, and now by the time the control flow reaches here it is already CRLF_BINARY. Would it affect the callers, and if so how? * get_convert_attr_ascii() would change the behaviour, right? It runs convert_attrs(), and with this change a path without attribute when autocrlf is not in effect would get BINARY and would show "-text", while the code before this change would give an empty string. Am I misreading the code, or is the change intended? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
