David Aguilar <dav...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 08:03:57AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Michael J Gruber <g...@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes: >> >> >> Does this mean that I should warn in the release notes that some >> >> existing users might get their expectation broken but we are going >> >> ahead anyway because we think most people read left to right and >> >> then top down? I am OK with saying that--I just wanted to make sure >> >> we know that it is what we are doing. >> > >> > I would claim that anyone who notices the difference in buffer numbering >> > would be positively surprised. >> >> Thanks. I, being a non-user of vim, was wondering if people who had >> their own user-defined commands (macros? and possibly short-cut keys >> to invoke them) built around the old (and odd) numbering need to >> adjust--in which case we may need to forewarn. >> >> > In any case, the buffer numbering is not the same (it is local remote >> > base merge) but it doesn't matter in this case because only one window >> > is displayed, so there is no visual association. >> >> OK, thanks. > > Sorry for not noticing this thread earlier. > The change and the rationale sound good to me. > > FWIW, > > Acked-by: David Aguilar <dav...@gmail.com>
Thanks all. Will merge to 'next' and then to 'master' shortly. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
