On 22 February 2016 at 19:29, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > Felipe Gonçalves Assis <felipeg.as...@gmail.com> writes: > >>> As I said, I am reluctant to take the 25%/50%/75% tests in their >>> current form. Let me take the first one and a half of the last one >>> (i.e. excluding the test) for now. >>> >>> Thanks. >> >> Ok, should I post a new version of the patch without the tests while I >> rework them or does that mean that you have already filtered them out >> locally? > > I already have and queued them tentatively as > > c443d39 merge-recursive: find-renames resets threshold > 83837ec merge-strategies.txt: fix typo > > but they haven't been merged to 'next', so it is up to you whether > you rebuild the remainder on top of c443d39 or redo these 5 patches > altogether (just tell me to drop these two if you go the latter > route). >
My original patch started with exactly those commits and then added the tests, so it is fine for me. The motivation for the reorganisation was bundling the relevant test with the fix, but then it might be better to publish the fix soon, right? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
