On 03/16, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2016, Paul Tan wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Johannes Schindelin > > <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, Paul Tan wrote: > > > > > >> diff --git a/t/perf/p3404-rebase-interactive.sh > > >> b/t/perf/p3404-rebase-interactive.sh > > >> new file mode 100755 > > >> index 0000000..aaca105 > > >> --- /dev/null > > >> +++ b/t/perf/p3404-rebase-interactive.sh > > >> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ > > >> > > >> [...] > > >> > > >> +test_perf 'rebase -i --onto master^' ' > > >> + git checkout perf-topic-branch && > > >> + git reset --hard perf-topic-branch-initial && > > >> + GIT_SEQUENCE_EDITOR=: git rebase -i --onto master^ master > > >> +' > > > > > > This measures the performance of checkout && reset && rebase -i. Maybe we > > > should only test rebase -i? > > > > test_perf runs the same script multiple times, so we need to reset > > --hard at least to undo the changes of the rebase. > > > > I think we can remove the reset if we use rebase -f and rebase onto > > the same base, but -f was not implemented in this patch series. > > Hrm. rebase -f just makes the reset an implicit part of the rebase, so it > seems we cannot perf *just* the rebase. We are stuck with perf'ing also > the reset. Sad.
I had the same problem back when I was working on index-v5 and posted a patch series. The discussion about it is at [1]. Maybe it could be worth resurrecting? [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/1379419842-32627-1-git-send-email-t.gumme...@gmail.com -- Thomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
