On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Eric Sunshine <sunsh...@sunshineco.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Eric Sunshine <sunsh...@sunshineco.com> > wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 5:52 AM, Zhang Lei <zhanglei...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> 2016-03-24 17:16 GMT+08:00 Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com>: >>>> I think we can follow git-clone and use '-n' for this. [...] >>> >>> My PATCH v1 did follow git-clone -n, however, Junio C Hamano and Eric >>> Sunshine >>> suggested that we should avoid doing so , as --no-no-checkout could be >>> confusing. >> >> My impression was that Duy was suggesting only that -n be recognized >> as shorthand for --no-checkout, however, git-worktree already >> recognizes -n as shorthand for --dry-run (as a consequence of using >> OPT__DRY_RUN), so -n as shorthand for --no-checkout is a no-go. > > Ignore this. It's only 'prune' which recognizes -n, so it's possible > that 'add' could recognize it for an alternate meaning (though the > documentation would want to make this very clear).
To make it clear, I don't feel strongly about '-n'. Yes muscle memory may count. But if '-n' may become a new confusion source in git-worktree then perhaps we should avoid it and go with --[no-]checkout -- Duy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
