Am 03.04.2016 um 08:24 schrieb Mehul Jain:
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Johannes Sixt <j...@kdbg.org> wrote:
Am 02.04.2016 um 19:58 schrieb Mehul Jain:
+for i in --autostash --no-autostash
+do
+ test_expect_success "pull $i (without --rebase) is illegal" '
+ test_must_fail git pull $i . copy 2>err &&
+ test_i18ngrep "only valid with --rebase" err
+ '
+done
Hm. If the implementation of test_expect_success uses the variable, too, its
value is lost when the test snippet runs. Fortunately, it does not.
You can make this code a bit more robust by using double-quotes around the
test code so that $i is expanded before test_expect_success is evaluated.
I think that the current format is preferred over the one you suggest.
Here[1] Junio
has given a descriptive explanation.
[1]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/283350/focus=284769
Junio has a point there, of course.
In this light, I suggest that you use a more verbose variable name.
-- Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
