Eric Sunshine <sunsh...@sunshineco.com> writes:
> Although I'm the one who brought up the idea of "automating" these
> tests, I'm not convinced that it's an improvement in this case, but I
> don't feel so strongly that I'd forbid it.
Another option is to define helper functions to shorten the "manual"
tests, e.g. define:
setup_rebase_test () {
git reset --hard before-rebase &&
echo dirty >new_file &&
git add new_file
}
rebase_test_ok () {
git pull $1 . copy &&
test_cmp_rev HEAD^ copy &&
test "$(cat new_file)" = dirty &&
test "$(cat file)" = "modified again"
}
rebase_test_err () {
test_must_fail git pull $1 . copy 2>err &&
test_i18ngrep "uncommitted changes." err
}
I'm also OK with keeping the "manual" tests.
--
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
