On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Pranit Bauva <pranit.ba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:00 AM, Eric Sunshine <sunsh...@sunshineco.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 7:33 PM, Pranit Bauva <pranit.ba...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Current implementation of parse-options.c treats OPT__QUIET() as integer
>>> and not boolean and thus it is more appropriate to print it as integer
>>> to avoid confusion.
>>
>> I can buy this line of reasoning, however, it would be even easier to
>> sell the change if you cited an existing client (a git command) which
>> actually respects multiple quiet levels. Are there any?
>
> I investigated into this. But I was unable to find any git commit
> which actually respects mulitple quiet levels. I first did a 'git grep
> OPT__QUIET' to find the commands which use this. Then I went through
> the documentation which covers it. None of them have any such mention
> of multiple quiet levels. But still I dug further and and went through
> all the individual source files. I followed the corresponding C source
> code for the header file included and also searched there for any
> trace of quiet. But I still didn't find any such use of multiple quiet
> levels. I have found that the commit id 212c0a6f (Duy Ngyuyen; 7 Dec,
> 2013; parse-options: remove OPT__BOOLEAN). Maybe he has something to
> say as to why this was introduced and OPT__QUIET which previously used
> OPT__BOOLEAN, now uses OPT_COUNTUP rather than OPT_BOOL. This commit
> In fact git-repack command has quiet but this is not mentioned in the
> documentation. If someone could include this it in the documentation.
> I would do it but I am not quite familiar with git-repack and haven't
> really used it anytime.

I didn't find any existing Git command recognizing multiple quiet
levels either, however, I think I can still buy the change considering
that there is existing precedent in other Unix commands.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to