Hmph, two patches in the previous series seem to be missing. On
purpose, or by mistake? Their net-effect is shown at the end of
this message, and I thought they made sense.
Puzzled...
diff --git a/builtin/branch.c b/builtin/branch.c
index 5ab106b..32be954 100644
--- a/builtin/branch.c
+++ b/builtin/branch.c
@@ -369,12 +369,14 @@ static char *get_head_description(void)
strbuf_addf(&desc, _("(no branch, bisect started on %s)"),
state.branch);
else if (state.detached_from) {
- /* TRANSLATORS: make sure these match _("HEAD detached at ")
- and _("HEAD detached from ") in wt-status.c */
if (state.detached_at)
+ /* TRANSLATORS: make sure this matches
+ "HEAD detached at " in wt-status.c */
strbuf_addf(&desc, _("(HEAD detached at %s)"),
state.detached_from);
else
+ /* TRANSLATORS: make sure this matches
+ "HEAD detached from " in wt-status.c */
strbuf_addf(&desc, _("(HEAD detached from %s)"),
state.detached_from);
}
@@ -828,8 +830,8 @@ int cmd_branch(int argc, const char **argv, const char
*prefix)
if (argc == 1 && track == BRANCH_TRACK_OVERRIDE &&
!branch_existed && remote_tracking) {
fprintf(stderr, _("\nIf you wanted to make '%s' track
'%s', do this:\n\n"), head, branch->name);
- fprintf(stderr, _(" git branch -d %s\n"),
branch->name);
- fprintf(stderr, _(" git branch --set-upstream-to
%s\n"), branch->name);
+ fprintf(stderr, " git branch -d %s\n", branch->name);
+ fprintf(stderr, " git branch --set-upstream-to
%s\n", branch->name);
}
} else
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
