Xiaolong Ye <[email protected]> writes:
> diff --git a/t/t4014-format-patch.sh b/t/t4014-format-patch.sh
> index eed2981..a6ce727 100755
> --- a/t/t4014-format-patch.sh
> +++ b/t/t4014-format-patch.sh
> @@ -1460,4 +1460,19 @@ test_expect_success 'format-patch -o overrides
> format.outputDirectory' '
> test_path_is_dir patchset
> '
>
> +test_expect_success 'format-patch --base' '
> + git checkout side &&
> + git format-patch --stdout --base=HEAD~~~ -1 >patch &&
> + grep -e "^base-commit:" -A3 patch >actual &&
> + echo "base-commit: $(git rev-parse HEAD~~~)" >expected &&
HEAD~3 would be easier to read (and HEAD~2 is easier than HEAD~~).
> + echo "prerequisite-patch-id: $(git show --patch HEAD~~ | git patch-id
> --stable | awk "{print \$1}")" >>expected &&
> + echo "prerequisite-patch-id: $(git show --patch HEAD~ | git patch-id
> --stable | awk "{print \$1}")" >>expected &&
> + test_cmp expected actual
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'format-patch --base error handling' '
> + ! git format-patch --base=HEAD~ -2 &&
> + ! git format-patch --base=HEAD~ -3
> +'
When making sure that "git" exits with a failure in a controlled way
(i.e. you want to consider "git" that segfaults as not passing the
test), do not use "! git cmd", but use "test_must_fail git cmd"
instead.
You now have a quite elaborate logic in base validation in this
round. Is the topology of the history used in this test still
complex enough to make sure the logic is being tested?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
