Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes:
> - if (starts_with(var, "credential."))
> + if (starts_with(var, "credential.") ||
> + (starts_with(var, "http.") &&
> + ends_with(var, ".extraheader")))
I know you are fond of indenting with HT without aligning things,
but this is going too far in the quest of making the code
unreadable.
if (starts_with(var, "credential.") ||
(starts_with(var, "http.") && ends_with(var, ".extraheader")))
would make iteasier to see what are the top-level items (there are two)
and how they are related (just one of them needs to be satisfied).
Assuming that we will discover more variables that can be safely
passed, I'd rather see the above written like this, though:
if (starts_with(var, "credential."))
return 1;
if (starts_with(var, "http.") && ends_with(var, ".extraheader"))
return 1;
return 0;
Or even something along this line:
struct whitelist {
const char *prefix;
const char *suffix;
} whitelist[] = {
{ "credential.", NULL },
{ "http.", ".extraheader" },
};
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(whitelist); i++) {
struct whitelist *w = &whitelist[i];
if ((!w->prefix || starts_with(var, w->prefix)) &&
(!w->suffix || ends_with(var, w->suffix)))
return 1;
}
return 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
