Torsten Bögershausen <[email protected]> writes: > git://host:[port]/path/to/repo > Knowing that, the "@" will be feed into the name resolver, > and that's OK.
Is it OK? It is plausible that our client side may even want to accept git://user:pass@host:port/local/part, and as an anonymous service, allow it to go to git://host:port/local/part without sending user:pass part over the wire. Or with the same knowledge that git:// is an anonymous service, it is also a plausible policy to error such a request out. To implement either needs a robust parsing of the URL, doesn't it? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
