On 05/03/2016 08:31 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Torsten Bögershausen <tbo...@web.de> writes:
This will probably take some time, so that's why I asked if 1/10..4/10 could
proceed as is ?
Sure, I wasn't saying 1-4 looked wrong at all. I was wondering why
the ones in the middle, especially 7, shouldn't be moved forward
together with them.
The main reason is, that 7 breaks t6038 under Windows.
(And I discovered that too late :-(
And as Windows is the platform being most interested in CRLF handling,
I need to re-do some work.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
