Hi Chris,
On Wed, 4 May 2016, Christian Couder wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Johannes Schindelin
> <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> > So... why not just say "bisect--helper: prepare for modes other than
> > 'next-all'"?
>
> For (an extreme) example, in my patch series about libifying "git apply"
> functionality, should many of the patches have subjects like
> "builtin/apply: prepare for an apply.{c,h} lib"?
You are deliberately misunderstanding me.
If your patch series contained *one* patch whose intent was to prepare for
a libified 'apply', yes, indeed, I would think that it would make for a
fine commit subject. Especially if the other patches tried to do
completely unrelated things. Then your "low-level" change would really
benefit from a "high-level" commit message: the "low-level" aspect is seen
easily enough in the patch itself, thankyouverymuch.
It really misrepresents my comment to pretend that I had tried to
suggest something as utterly confusing as identically repeated commit
subjects.
Ciao,
Johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
